ワークショップ
2010年度 第1回 意思決定班ワークショップ
共催:早稲田大学
- 日時
- 2010年4月22日(木) 14時00分から17時30分
- 場所
- 早稲田大学戸山校舎 第1会議室(33号館2階)
http://www.waseda.jp/jp/campus/toyama.html
- 報告概要
司会 竹村和久(早稲田大学意思決定研究所)
1. Vladimir Volokhonsky氏 (ロシア国立サンクトペテルブルグ大学心理学部)
POST-HEURISTIC DISSONANCE
We are based on the assumption that there is unconscious
knowledge of the true answers to some questions. People, who are
giving incorrect answers resulting from the use of heuristics,
therefore, should experience some level of cognitive dissonance.
It was decided to check it on the example of the anchoring
effect. People's estimates of uncertain quantities are commonly
influenced by irrelevant values (anchoring effect). We suppose
the presence of the cognitive dissonance reduction related with
anchoring. 28 participants filled out a form with
anchoring-loaded task twice with a three week interval. After
the second test procedure the frequency of bias towards the
anchor point exceeded the frequency of the opposite bias. This
new secondly formed bias was accompanied by increase of the
assurance level. Nonlinear correlation between assurance and
anchoring levels was also found. These results suggest the
presence of the cognitive dissonance after an anchoring.The
Study II showed interaction between anchor remoteness and
cognitive dissonance level. Five levels of anchor remoteness
were tested for reaction time (measurement of cognitive
dissonance). Nonlinear correlation has been found: the farther
was the anchor, the larger was the cognitive dissonance, but
there are increase of cognitive dissonance at the zero anchor
remoteness. In the Study III also anchor remoteness was tested
for the produced anchoring effect level. Inflection of the
functional curve were supposed, but anchoring effect continued
to increase steadily in correspondence with increase of anchor
remoteness up to 500% remoteness point.
2.Michael W. Myers氏 (早稲田大学意思決定研究所)
The Structure of Self-Other Overlap and its Relationship to
Perspective Taking
Mixed results for self-other overlap as a mediator of
perspective taking’s pro-social effects may be due to the use of
different methodologies and scales to measure self-other
overlap. To test this idea, three studies investigate the
structure of self-other overlap and examine how perspective
taking may affect only certain facets of self-other overlap. To
test the conceptual equivalence of different overlap measures,
in Study 1, participants (n = 132) completed several previously
used measures of overlap for two targets: their best friend.
Factor analyses revealed two distinct factors of self-other
overlap - perceived closeness and overlapping representations.
Perceived closeness but not overlapping representations was
associated with relationship quality. Studies 2 (n = 118) and 3
(n = 118) manipulated perspective taking, using a target person
who was similar and dissimilar, respectively, to participants.
Results replicated the same factor structure from Study 1, and
found that perspective taking had different effects on the two
factors. Together, these results suggest that self-other overlap
is a multi-dimensional construct with only the dimension of
perceived closeness being associated with psychological
responses related to perspective taking